AndreaPN

🟩 Virtuals vs 🏦Bankr: Which Launcher Is Better for Founders? To be fair, every launcher has its own strengths. Founders choosing between @virtuals_io and @bankrbot should not focus on which platform is "better". The real question is which model fits their goals, fundraising strategy, and long-term vision. 1. Fundraising 🟩 Virtuals: ■ Strengths: Virtuals keeps a large allocation under team control and only adds around 5% of supply into LP at launch. This gives projects a higher starting mc, making them look more established and credible from day one. The ACF mechanism also allows liquidity to be added on the sell side, generating revenue for the team without directly selling tokens into the main pair. As a result, founders have more resources to keep building over the long term. ■ Weaknesses: The model benefits the team more than buyers. Buying is usually easy, but selling large size can be difficult because liquidity remains relatively low. Whales are less willing to enter with large positions when exiting becomes a challenge. A single trade >$5k can create significant price volatility. With low liquidity, projects depend heavily on founder execution. If the team fails to deliver, liquidity risks can become a major issue later on. 🏦 Bankr: ■ Strengths: Bankr uses a fair launch model. All tokens are minted and added to LP from the start, giving everyone the same entry opportunity once the contract is live. Liquidity is always good because LP is locked, cannot withdraw. Founders raise capital mainly through trading fees. These fees are paid in both WETH and project tokens, meaning more volume leads to more revenue and a larger ownership stake for founders. Bankr also has the unique "pls bro" culture. The community actively searches for promising developers, encourages them to launch on Bankr, and delegates fees to them. This creates a strong grassroots system for attracting builders without relying on a large BD team. ■ Weaknesses: The model is highly dependent on trading volume. Once hype fades and the flywheel slows down, fee generation drops quickly. Founders may lose motivation if revenue declines and they do not hold a meaningful percentage of the supply. The "pls bro" culture also creates strong speculative behavior. Many trenches accumulate tokens early while waiting for a developer to accept the project. Once that happens, they often take profits on later buyers. As a result, projects face heavy distribution pressure early on. If they cannot maintain attention or show progress fast enough, they can lose momentum and die quickly. 2. Attention In the current climate of low liquidity and high speculative capital flows, attention is the most important factor in generating volume for a project. 🏦 Bankr: ■ Strengths: @0xDeployer is currently one of the biggest yappers of attention within the Bankr ecosystem and on @base also. A single tweet, quote, or reply can generate significant volume and visibility for projects. Much of Bankr's recent growth has been fueled by his influence and ability to rally the community. For founders seeking rapid growth, this is a major advantage. ■ Weaknesses: A large portion of ecosystem attention is concentrated around one person. If engagement or influence declines, the ecosystem's ability to generate attention could also weaken. 🟩 Virtuals: ■ Strengths: Virtuals takes a more structured approach to ecosystem promotion through weekly updates and project spotlights. This helps projects maintain visibility and build reputation over time. ■ Weaknesses: Virtuals currently lacks a single KOL or personality capable of creating immediate fomo and driving large volumes from retail. Its amplification is more focused on information sharing than creating instant buying pressure. This makes it less effective than Bankr at generating explosive volume. Also, Virtuals has many core members, but some of them sometime promote farm projects, leading to a loss of trust within the community. In terms of generating attention and volume for a project, Virtuals is significantly weaker than Bankr. They often fail to appear at crucial moments when the project needs them, for ex: when a project has a big update. They lack the resources to amplify the information at the peak of organic volume and only release the news later, something they cannot match Bankr in. 3. Infrastructure 🟩 Virtuals: ■ Strengths: After years of development, Virtuals has built one of the most complete agent ecosystems in crypto. Programs and standards such as ACP, ERC-8183, aGDP, Degen Claw, Eastworld, and EconomyOS provide founders with a strong foundation to build on. Teams can leverage existing tools, standards, and networks instead of starting from scratch. Technical contributors like @celesteanglm, @miratisu_ps, @0x02yang... are also known for actively supporting builders. ■ Weaknesses: None tbh. 🏦 Bankr: ■ Strengths: Although Bankr only started building its ecosystem a few months ago, it has already launched initiatives such as hackathons, funding programs, LLM Gateway, and Webhooks. Its execution speed has been impressive. ■ Weaknesses: Its infrastructure is still far behind Virtuals in terms of maturity. Projects launching on Bankr need a clear business model and the ability to operate independently. Success depends more on the founder's own execution than ecosystem support. 4. Case Study I'm not speaking based on emotions, this is number talk. The fundraising difference becomes clearer when looking at two standout projects. @StrikeRobot_ai ( $SR ) on Virtuals > 9 weeks live > $6.73M lifetime volume > Founder receives 70% of trading fees: ~$47k in $cbBTC @AskSurplus ( $surplus ) on Bankr > 3 weeks live > $36.3M lifetime volume > Founder receives 57% of trading fees: ~$207k in $WETH and $surplus Despite receiving a lower fee share, Surplus generated roughly 4.4x more founder revenue than Strike Robot. More importantly, it achieved this in only one-third of the time. This suggests that, today, Bankr provides a much stronger fundraising environment for founders. The combination of attention, community participation, and trading activity creates a powerful short-term capital formation engine. However, this is still a short-term observation. Virtuals has been building its ecosystem for years, while Bankr's ecosystem is only a few months old. The bigger question is not who can generate more revenue in the first few weeks, but which model can continue supporting founders and projects 6 months, 12 months, or even years later. ( personally, it's quite disheartening that I built $CAP @Capminal for 13 months and the fees we earn were only one-third of what a Bankr's project built in 3 weeks earned 😂 ) 5. Conclusion Today, Bankr clearly has the advantage in short-term fundraising. This advantage is gained by leveraging community effort through the 'pls bro' meta and large speculative flows that allow founders to raise significant funds in a short period. Virtuals leveraged community effort during the Virtuals Genesis era, but that meta is now over, and they truly need something different to revive.

This is what happens when you get amplified at the right time by a big account like @0xDeployer Imo, this is exactly what projects need. It’s what @virtuals_io is missing and what @bankrbot already has, as I analyzed before. Attention at Right timing → volume https://t.co/tXnfWcGjUK

imo, @RobinhoodCrypto is positioning its chain as a hub for financial services and real-world assets. that gives AI agent platforms like @virtuals_io an edge over meme launchers like @bankrbot. when traditional wall street style projects start building agents on Robinhood, they’ll likely lean toward Virtuals, since it feels more built for serious use cases. even though Bankr is shifting toward AI agent infrastructure, it’s still not on the same level yet.

🚨🚨🚨 The Biggest Mistake Founders Make When Launching a Token Many founders read success stories from @bankrbot or @virtuals_io and come away with the same conclusion: "If I launch on these platforms, my token will get volume, people will buy, and I can make money." > Wrong approach. The most important thing behind volume is not the launcher. It's ATTENTION. If you can't bring attention yourself, then the launcher needs to bring it for you. But for a launcher to support your project, you usually need one of these two things, ideally both: 1️⃣ A Great Project - Strong idea - Solid business model - Unique technology - Real product value 2️⃣ A Strong Dev Profile > Many builders believe they have 1️⃣. In reality, launchers often care more about 2️⃣. Look at builders like: - @kevincodex with $gitlawb - @aaronjmars with $aeon - @mac_eth with $surplus - @MLeeJr with $lfi They all have strong reputations and a large base of smart followers. When they launch a project, attention naturally flows toward them. Launchers are happy to support them, amplify volume, and generate more trading fees. That advantage didn't happen by accident. My Personal Case Study: 13 months ago, I launched @Capminal $CAP on Virtuals Genesis. At the time, my dev profile was basically zero (to be fair, it's still nearly zero today 😂 ). My project didn't get much recognition from KOLs or the Virtuals community, even though we were one of the very few teams building: > A DeFAI agent that could trade directly on X > A fully functional DeFAI terminal One big KOL in the Virtuals ecosystem even said: "If my project passes genesis, then do an AMA," while they always do AMAs to promote projects with good dev profiles BEFORE their genesis starts → autopass 😂 That KOL has now disappeared, his traffic flopper than me now haha. Btw, we ended up reaching around 300% oversubscription. Looking back, most of that wasn't because of the product. It was because my friend @AzFlin joined as a contributor. People bought in because they saw him on the team. They didn't really care what we were building. That was a secondary factor. On the same day, another project (I'm not at liberty to mention names) reached 1500% oversubscription simply because it was backed by a large guild and well-known names in the community. About 4 months later, its chart slowly rugged and never recovered. Nobody seemed surprised. People in this market are often more willing to bet on a project backed by a famous name than a project with a great product but no recognizable supporters. The Lesson When launching a project, strong dev profile is your most valuable asset. To get attention and support from launchers, you need a strong dev profile. If you see a launcher heavily supporting a project whose dev profile is weak or anonymous, there is usually a reason. Either the launcher knows the team behind the project outside , or the project is being built internally by them. A great product still matters. But in the early stages, people usually buy into the builder first and the product second. Before thinking about where to launch your token, ask yourself one question: > Who is paying attention to you? Because at the end of the day, a launcher is just a tool. ATTENTION is what creates volume. But that's only half the story. At launch, attention and reputation often matter more than the product itself. People buy into the builder first and the product second. $CAP, despite being only ~300% oversubscribed, is still growing 13 months after TGE. Meanwhile, the project that launched on the same day and reached 1500% oversubscription is gone. Attention wins the launch. The product wins the future 🟪

🟦 @base launchpad token 7-day onchain volume showdown: 1/ $VIRTUAL: $72.68M 2/ $CLANKER: $3.92M 3/ $BNKR: $3.22M 4/ $LIQ: $0.53M $VIRTUAL ( @virtuals_io ) prints ~18.5x the volume of #2 because its deep liquidity + $265M mcap, undisputed king of Base launchpad tokens. $BNKR ( @bankrbot ) down ~12% over the past week, price slide dragging trading volume down with it. Meanwhile $CLANKER ( @clanker_world ) quietly overtakes $BNKR on 7D volume, fueled by B20 + V5 rumors. Can be a momentum shifting. Don't sleep on $LIQ ( @_proxystudio ) either, lowest volume today but a potential launchpad worth watching closely. Early movers get rewarded. ⚠️ Note: onchain DEX volume only. $VIRTUAL, $CLANKER & $BNKR also trade on CEXs, so real total volume is higher.

When you look at the image below, it feels like you are staring at a galaxy filled with thousands of shining stars. But it is not a galaxy at all. It is the growing number of agents being built inside the @virtuals_io sandbox. Bring your agent into the Virtuals ACP, explore what others are creating, check out the article below.

🚨 JUST RELEASE: Scalping Trade — Trend-Following Pullback v2 — AI Mode @virtuals_io Degen Arena Last week I used AI (OpenClaw + Skill) as the orchestrator to automate @captain_dackie’s flow and noticed several issues: 1. The system was unstable because AI ran one long flow with many steps, making it hard to keep consistency in each run. 2. AI cost was high since the OpenClaw agent had to call a cron job every 3 minutes. So I switched my approach. The orchestrator now uses traditional code to ensure every run behaves the same. AI is applied only to judge entries as one of four groups: RSI, pullback to EMA, volume, and AI Judge. A trade opens when 3 of 4 groups pass. This method keeps the system consistent across runs, delivers precise entries, and has AI judging each entry. Beyond these highlights, risk management, macro filter, position management, and forum updates are shown in the diagram below for the community to reference. All metrics are controlled in a parameter file and tuned for positive PnL. It is still in the setup phase, so numbers are not stable rn, but my goal is full automation without humans in the loop.

Agent commerce now on @BNBCHAIN Powered by @virtuals_io 👀 $VIRTUAL $500M market cap is undervalue fr

.@virtuals_io genesis used to the best version because it can make "CT effect" by yapping meta, and attract more volume by virgen points. imo difficult to build again that effect at now. Narratives now still around AI /LLM , github's side products, VVV's side products, bankr's apps, defi edge case.... There are many good builders but other launchers has better volume than Virtuals so they choose others. Virtuals need to do better basically, Virtuals need a new mechanism to attract more volume.

In a market where price decides everything and product feels optional, we chose to keep building, even when nobody was watching. The crypto market in general, and the @virtuals_io ecosystem in particular, moves insanely fast. It has been 9 months since I did the TGE for $CAP on Virtuals Genesis. Back then, we spoke with several big KOLs who had strong influence in the ecosystem. I asked them a simple question: Have you actually used our product? Why did you rank us C ( maybe even D ), while other projects launched the same week has been ranked A/A+, only updated their genesis card and had a website with a single “Join waitlist” button? The answer I got was clear. My dev profile reputation was low. Other teams came from big names, joined hackathons, had strong backgrounds, and so on. That was enough. It was fine. I understood. At that moment, I realized something important. In this market, product is not the top priority. To be more honest, product is often the lowest priority. The highest priority is dev reputation, relationships, shared allocation, and who you know. Now, 9 months later, I look back. Most projects that launched around the same time as $CAP have stopped building (I'm not mentioning names here) . Their tokens are forgotten. Their X accounts stopped updating. Sometimes they come back when a narrative fits, just to catch some volume. The KOLs who once rated us are different now too. Some went offline. Some switched topics. Many no longer talk about @virtuals_io We are still here. Building every single day. I am not saying we won. In fact, our total trading volume and fee generated over 9 months maybe not even equal what they made in 2 or 3 months during their big pump. But in the end, we still have a real product. We still have users. We still believe in what we are building. Many of them moved on, building new shiny cakes to sell to their audience. It feels like a repeating cycle. Teams with high dev reputation wait for a good story. Then they continue to sell a “join waitlist” page to retail. Retail keeps doing trenches. Honestly, the word trenches sounds cool. I do not know who created it 😂 . It makes the people who wear trench coats feel "cool". But the truth is, 90% of trenches are liquidity. Maybe only 10% are real trenches. Retail keeps flipping new projects, chasing the x100 dream in a few days. That dream has haunted them since the first time they entered this market. Crypto is strange. Retail today is not like retail in 2021. Five years ago, they were trained to look for hidden gems, good tech, good product, and hold to x100. In 2025, everything changed. @Pumpfun trained retail to become gamblers. They are taught to create a Phantom wallet, listen to KOL calls, ape in, and expect x50 or x100 in a few days. If it does not pump, move to the next play. If the token price goes up, it is a good project. If the token price does not go up, it is a scam. Product does not really matter. Price going up is enough. That may sound negative. I actually tried to study and follow that path. But I could not do it. Everyone likes money. I do too. But making money by building only a shiny shell, hiring KOLs to shill, selling tokens to the community, or creating hype just to farm trading fees does not feel good to me. Building a real product feels different. Shipping useful features. Watching real users use them. Seeing system logs update line by line. That feeling is something every true builder understands. I will keep building based on my thesis for many more years. Together with my teammate. Maybe less money. But much more joy.

I respect it, the real report like this focus on real data instead of other report/podcast with emotional takes or attacks on the teams helping build @virtuals_io aGDP. If you support Virtuals, you should support aGDP too. It is a key metric that helps Virtuals compete with other agent commerce platforms.

🚨 Building a Swap Agent on Virtuals ACP? Read This Before You Go Live This is the swap flow of @Capminal on @virtuals_io ACP. To graduate on Virtuals ACP, your agent must stay online most of the time, keep a high job success rate, handle jobs correctly without timeout, and process refunds accurately when errors happen. When you meet these standards, your agent will rank higher on the ACP Registry. To achieve that, especially for a swap service, here are the key points you need to understand. 1⃣ First, the ACP job flow has 5 main phases: REQUEST, PAYMENT, TRANSACTION, DELIVERY, and EVALUATION. You must follow this design. 2⃣ In the REQUEST phase, remember that ACP does not support native $ETH. Everything must be ERC20, as mentioned in the whitepaper. So if a user wants to swap from native ETH, you must reject the request immediately. 3⃣ In the PAYMENT phase, the fee is collected. If you charge by volume percentage, the fee should be taken from the input token. If you charged by fixed, fee taken is $USDC 4⃣ In the TRANSACTION phase, the agent’s Smart Wallet receives the fee. However, the input token and the swap execution are handled by a whitelisted EOA wallet configured in the agent portal. After the swap succeeds, the EOA transfers the output token to the Smart Wallet and calls 'deliverPayable' to send output token back to the user. 5⃣ When moving funds, always wait and verify 'balanceOf' on the target wallet before continuing. If you skip this step, the RPC node may not index the balance in time, and you could call swap or transfer while the funds have not actually arrived. 6⃣ Always use at least two RPC endpoints as backup. RPC errors happen frequently, even with paid services. You can configure fallback transport using viem to reduce risk. 7⃣ Most importantly, always trigger a refund if any error happens in any phase. If a flow crashes and does not enter the refund logic, the user will not get their money back. That is a critical issue. If you are building AI Agent, your agent should onboard @virtuals_io ACP, aGDP. If you have any questions, feel free to comment below and let’s discuss.

Over the past 2 weeks, while the community has been arguing between @virtuals_io and @bankrbot about which launchpad is better, a wave of projects has migrated from Bankr to Virtuals. Let’s do a quick round-up: which projects moved, how the community reacted, and most importantly, how their performance looks after migrating to Virtuals. 🟩 $LBM @Litebeam_xyz The universal routing layer for AI agents that enables a single MCP connection to access thousands of microservices with zero API keys, powered by real-time vendor auctions and onchain settlement. In 2 weeks, LBM reached $2.59M lifetime volume, total generated fee: $33.61k, in this, creator earn $18k. This project feels like a serious infra layer. Litebeam also got support from Virtuals, Virtuals even published a dedicated post to introduce it, which helped bring more eyes to the project. But @0xDeployer called the LBM dev team “farmers”. Btw, the volume over the last two weeks has been pretty solid, the team hasn't "farm" yet. 🟩 $ROOTAI @Root_Edge The AI-powered trading agent and real-time intel terminal on Base, enabling natural language trades (e.g. on Hyperliquid) with local signing, sub-second latency, and MCP integration. In 3 days, ROOTAI reached $544k lifetime volume, total generated fee: $7.08k fee, in this, creator earn $3.8k. Team RootAI had a heated debate with 0xDeployer before deciding to migrate to Virtuals. But since the move, Virtuals still hasn’t backed them up or supported them on socials. 🟩 $WAKE @WakeOnBase The AI-powered intelligence terminal on Base that analyzes tokens for safety, liquidity, holder risks, and early rug signals No drama at all. WAKE migrated to Virtuals smoothly while still keep good connection with Bankr, and Virtuals backed it up with strong support on socials. In 2 days, WAKE reached $235k lifetime volume, total generated fee: $3.06k fee, in this, creator earn $1.64k. Among all three projects, LBM has the best lifetime volume and the most potential, picking up solid support over the past two weeks. ROOTAI and WAKE only launched a few days ago, so they still need time to prove themselves. But when you stack them against the attention and volume that Bankr and 0xDeployer can pull in, it's not even close. A single reply from 0xDeployer can easily drag in $200k to $300k in volume. On the flip side, projects on Virtuals have ACF to raise funds for the team, and the team gets a fixed % of tokenomics instead of relying purely on trading volume like Bankr (though Bankr just updated to hold back 15% vesting over two years for creators). Every launcher has its own strengths and weaknesses, and builders need to choose wisely, refer my quote post.

🚨 Sleeping giant in the AI Agent? VIRTUAL might be it $VIRTUAL is currently trading in a long term accumulation zone, a level that makes sense for investors looking to hold through the next cycle. It has been 1 full year, and @virtuals_io is still the #1 AI Agent Launchpad on @base . While most projects slow down in bear markets, Virtuals keeps shipping. They are not just following narratives, they are creating them. In just 12 months, Virtuals has launched 3 launchpad versions: Prototype, Genesis, and most recently Unicorn. Regardless of bull or bear conditions, the team continues building non stop. Projects launched on Virtuals have never lost attention. 📊 The numbers speak for themselves • 16,200+ AI agents launched • $643M total ecosystem market cap • $69M revenue shared This is already the largest AI Agent ecosystems in crypto. The second version, Genesis, combined with the famous virgen points, became legendary. It created the yapper meta and was copied by many other launchpads later. A large number of AI agent projects were born from Genesis, including @capminal $CAP. Of course, not all agents survived. Many were pure hype and faded away. But a small group turned into real products with hundreds of thousands of daily users and strong communities. Virtuals has clearly become the incubator of choice for AI Agent projects that want to build community and launch tokens. The ACP ecosystem is another massive unlock. This is where agents inside Virtuals interact with each other. What started as a single whitepaper page in early 2025 has evolved into a full A2A network, with dozens of agents interacting daily. One key metric is aGDP, which tracks total trading value and service fees between agents. Since its launch, aGDP has grown consistently and now sits at $411M. The newest launchpad model, Unicorn, did not generate the same hype as Genesis, but it still produced some promising names. A standout example is $REPPO @reppo , a Prediction Markets project. In the next uptrend, Unicorn could host larger launches, or Virtuals may pivot again if the model does not meet expectations. And that is the key strength here. Build fast. Fail fast. Fix fast. This mindset is why Virtuals keeps moving forward while others stall. 📉 From a price perspective $VIRTUAL is sitting on a strong weekly support. A simple strategy could be: • First buy at current levels • Second buy around $0.4 to $0.5, which is the pre breakout base before the major pump last November and the April correction caused by tariff news Current stats: • Market cap: $475M • FDV: $724M This valuation looks very reasonable for the core token of a full AI Agent ecosystem. Don't forget their proposals in these, the vision is $10, $20 and $40. Not financial advice but this post is a call for action 😂 #Virgenity

Agent Score is a smart upgrade from @virtuals_io https://t.co/lIT0lLmTML In epoch 1, agents could pump fake or looped sales and still grab big rewards. Now if your revenue comes from just one wallet or a tiny group of buyers, your multiplier drops to the floor, Quick simulation with $10,000 in agent generated fees : If you stick with 1 buyer (or very few): Buyer Diversity ≈ 0.10 → Agent Score ≈ 1,000 only. → You get crushed by the penalty, even with decent volume. To hit the optimal Agent Score (close to max multiplier ×9 ~ 10), you need real buyer diversity. Here are realistic targets > For a strong multiplier (~×9.5, diversity ≈ 0.95): You need around 88 buyers. Average spend per buyer: ≈ $114. → Agent Score ≈ 9,500 > For very high (~×9.8, diversity ≈ 0.98): Around 223 buyers. Average spend: ≈ $45 → Score ≈ 9,800 For near-perfect (~×9.9, diversity ≈ 0.99): Around 448 buyers. Average spend: ≈ $22. → Score ≈ 9,900 So if you want the highest multiplier, build an agent with a diverse, real buyer base. Or... you could try faking a whole crowd of buyers (but good luck 😂 ).

Big alpha today. @virtuals_io just launched its first ever Titan. Not every team can access Titan. Only strong, well funded and qualified builders make it. The first Titan project is @FabricFND, building open robotics + AGI for everyone, with @openmind_agi as early contributor. Token is $ROBO. Early buyers get rewarded: For the first 14 days, all net buyers in the $ROBO/$VIRTUAL pool share 0.01% of total $ROBO supply, pro rata. Example: If you buy 100k out of 1M total net buy volume, you get 10% of the incentive pool. Rewards are distributed after 2 weeks. $ROBO is already listed on Binance Alpha and Binance Futures. That means serious budget spent on listings plus Titan launch. Not a small liquidity farm play. Still, projects on Binance Alpha often face sell pressure from airdrop farmers and team unlocks, so manage risk. But this is the first Titan ever. There will be "the first" effect. If you are unsure about $ROBO, you can always accumulate $VIRTUAL. $ROBO is paired with $VIRTUAL anyway. In any scenario, ecosystem growth flows back to $VIRTUAL. $ROBO TGE in next 1 hour 15 mins.

Today I had a quick and interesting chat with @bigwil about @virtuals_io aGDP and the current dynamics between builders in the ecosystem. It was a constructive conversation where we exchanged perspectives on incentives, builders’ behavior, and how different teams are navigating the system. One thing I appreciate about conversations like this is that they help clarify how people in the ecosystem see the same mechanism from different angles. Even when we don’t fully agree, the discussion itself is valuable. Here are a few points where we found common ground. 1⃣ We both agree that incentives shape behavior. The aGDP system naturally pushes teams to compete on metrics and rankings. When a system rewards certain outcomes, builders will optimize toward them. This is not unique to Virtuals, it’s a general principle in any incentive-driven ecosystem. 2⃣ We both acknowledge that the current environment encourages competition around leaderboard performance. Many teams are focusing on optimizing their agents, distribution, and metrics to stay competitive. In many ways, this has become the meta of the ecosystem. 3⃣ We also share the view that real builders should ultimately win in the long run. While short-term strategies may vary, sustainable value still comes from teams that can build products, communities, and real utility over time. At the same time, we had a few different perspectives. 1⃣ One area of disagreement is how to interpret aggressive optimization of the aGDP system. My view is that when incentives are open and transparent, builders will naturally experiment and optimize within the rules of the system. In that sense, many teams are simply playing the game that the incentive structure creates. 2⃣ Bigwil’s perspective is that when teams create agents or narratives without a genuine intention to build long-term utility, it can take rewards away from builders who are focused on real products. From that angle, the concern is less about the rules and more about the spirit of the ecosystem. 3⃣ Another difference is where responsibility lies. I tend to see incentive design as the main driver, if a mechanism can be optimized, it likely will be. Meanwhile, Bigwil emphasized that builders themselves also carry responsibility for how they participate in the system. Despite these differences, the conversation remained positive and constructive. Healthy debate is part of how ecosystems mature. When builders openly discuss incentives, strategies, and expectations, it helps everyone understand the system better. At the end of the day, we’re all participating in the same evolving @virtuals_io ecosystem. The incentives will continue to change, strategies will adapt, and the teams that combine strong building with smart optimization will likely be the ones that last. Always appreciate thoughtful discussions like this 🤝

If you did not know, most claw agent tokens on @virtuals_io aGDP are launched using the Pegasus model. Quick brief: pegasus token starts as a fair launch. When it collects 42k $VIRTUAL in the bonding curve contract ( Virtuals Protocol V2 ), it migrates its LP to Uniswap V2 and gets locked for 10 years. Now @Capminal just upgraded our swap feature. You can swap pegasus tokens even while they are still in the bonding curve contract. No need to log in to the Virtuals page. No need to pre-load $VIRTUAL. You can swap from any token into a Pegasus token via @Butler_Agent on ACP, via @captain_dackie on X, or via our terminal. 👉 https://t.co/UjpccczV4K

🚨 @virtuals_io Degen Claw Season Mechanism with ACP V2 Upgrade Season 3 of Degen Claw has kicked off with big updates from the Virtuals team, featuring two major changes. 1⃣ Agents now trade directly through @HyperliquidX ’s API. This gives a clear edge to scalping strategies that need ultra-low latency. 2⃣ Pot PnL is now used to buy back and burn agent tokens. The process is simpler, removing the old complex subscribe mechanism. Here’s a quick diagram summary of the new Virtuals Degen Claw system. Check it out for a clear view of how it all works.

Agent Commerce is real @virtuals_io has officially launched its Revenue Incentives for AI, shifting the focus from speculative trading to real service-based earnings. Each epoch, the incentive pool is funded by two revenue streams: 0.3% of token swap fees across the Virtual ecosystem and 10% of gross revenue generated through ACP service transactions. This means rewards are not inflationary, they are recycled protocol revenue. The total pool is split into 30% for the Top 10 agents by service volume and 70% distributed pro-rata to the long tail. Each qualifying agent’s allocation is then divided equally: 50% paid directly to builders in USDC and 50% used to buy back the agent’s token on the open market, with those tokens vested to users over 12 months. In short, more service sales = higher ranking = larger reward allocation. If you want a clear visual breakdown of how fees flow and how rewards are calculated, take a look at the diagram provided ↓

🟪 I always say it clearly: @capminal is built to bring value to the CAP holders community. I launched $CAP from @virtuals_io Genesis. Every $VIRTUAL raised was added to LP with CAP and locked for 10 years. The team holds zero tokens. From the remaining 50% allocation, I already distributed 9% to airdrop programs since TGE and 1% to core contributors who supported the journey. The last 40% was fully burned so CAP becomes a true fair launch. I did not take any VC investment so I do not need to follow anyone else’s direction. I am building what I believe is right and what captures the maximum value for CAP holders. I do not have any dev allocation because I burned everything. I must buy CAPfrom the market just like everyone. My current average entry is around 30% below the current price. I am holding almost 5% of total supply and still accumulating more. CAP has no inflation. It only becomes more deflationary over time. This is a direct way to create value for holders. Holders are the most precious asset to me because you are the ones who create value for CAP. Without holders, no matter how good the project is, it means nothing. I hope CAP will continue to welcome more and more believers in the future. Now CAP already has a monthly buyback and burn event. There is buyback and reward for the CAP XP leaderboard. XP is earned mainly by staking and swapping on Capminal. Like I said from day one I am building all benefits around CAP holders and Capminal users. I am still developing more features. I believe the future of #DeFAI will have its own strong position in the market. AI Agent trading will not be just a short trend. It can become a new long term trading behavior in crypto. A few late night thoughts. Short rest then back to build 💪 Type to DeFAI 🦡

🚨 ERC-8183: Agentic Commerce is a proposed Ethereum standard that introduces a trustless commerce layer for AI agents. Developed by @virtuals_io and the @ethereumfndn 's dAI team. It defines a simple Job model where a Client funds a task in escrow, a Provider submits the work, and an Evaluator verifies the result to automatically release or refund payment on-chain. It also supports optional hooks for features like bidding, privacy, fund management, and reputation checks via ERC-8004, ERC-8183 enables secure, permissionless agent-to-agent (A2A) transactions while generating on-chain reputation signals. 👉 For a clearer understanding of the flow, roles, lifecycle, and how hooks and reputation integrate, please refer to the attached diagram.

Bring your agent to @virtuals_io agdp now, time to earn 💸🤑 It’s not just about the ACP service fee, there is also a 0.3% trading tax on ALL agent tokens that go straight into the reward pool every epoch. The higher we rank, the bigger the rewards. If we reach Top 5, the reward allocation increases, giving even more back to participants. After each epoch ends, the @Capminal team will instantly receive 50% of the rewards in $USDC. The remaining 50% will be used to market buy $CAP tokens. These tokens will then be distributed to buyers with a 12 month vesting period. My previous post (quote) explained the improvement point of agdp, the Agent Score. Now, only agents who have real buyers can receive a higher score and a higher ranking. This agdp model is designed to reward both buyers and builders. That reason why you need to bring your agent to agdp now, even as buyer role, your agent can also earn.

Update @virtuals_io Degen Claw My agent currently has rPnl $92, uPnL $42, WR 54%, closed position 37. All trades has R:R 1:2, no win/loss trade with large volume. And yes , my agent now top 1 PnL, but top 40 in leaderboard 😂 Btw I'm still tuning trading strategic to optimize pnl, skipping top 3 now because Sortino is a weird rule, hard to follow 😂 For people who want to win top 3 leaderboard, it's easy. At the end of epoch you just need to create some agents and run randomly 3 4 trade with small volume (volume not important). Then try to close position with positive PnL then you will have 7000 ~8000 score, easy to top 3, then stop trade and wait. To: @everythingempty @miratisu_ps @0xTP91 at now Degen Claw agent stuck transactions again, please fix 🫡

🚨🚨 The Real Goal on @virtuals_io Degen Claw: Build a Sustainable Trading System In short, my goal is to build a flexible trading system that can adapt to all market conditions, without human in the loop, and generate consistent returns with stable percentage gains. This takes time an cannot build it in one week.

This should have happened much earlier. @virtuals_io Protocol is the biggest AI agent project on @base, with the largest community and the highest #x402 transactions. Yet it only just made it onto the Coinbase roadmap. A bit late, but still a strong signal of recognition. $VIRTUAL is coming to Coinbase 🔥

We are so back 🫡 $VIRTUAL $CAP https://t.co/z4nbSeKGHw

💬 Feedback for Degen Claw @virtuals_io I just finished setting up captain dackie (@Capminal’s agent) to auto trade using 'dgclaw-skill' . I hit a few bumps and also saw a lot of potential. To @everythingempty @celesteanglm @miratisu_ps here’s my feedback: 1) The 'subscribe' button is bug. Sometimes i click and it doesn’t charge. sometimes it charges, but the posts and positions show up then disappear after i refresh (f5). please fix. 2) dgclaw-skill works well with claude code or OpenClaw. It feels smooth and stable. I think agent should post forum to track and open discussion after create a trade. 3) Should add 2 more skills from @HyperliquidX: get price and get all positions. And agents also need time series price data so they can read charts and run auto trades ( i'm finding good sources 😂 ). I opened a PR to contribute: https://t.co/lPpP6Tinvw please take a look, ty 🙏

I just cleaned up my @virtuals_io watchlist and realized I had to remove a lot of projects. So I realize time is fast and we are old here, 1 year +. Imagine next week @base szn starts, @virtuals_io szn kicks in, $VIRTUAL pumps to $2, every one mention about it. Then a week later, VIRTUAL sends back to its 5B ATH mc while you're holding agent tokens paired with $VIRTUAL. The people who missed the train and the crazy fomo crowd start hunting for hidden gems in the ecosystem. They quickly notice which projects are still active and money starts flowing in. And you already built your position early, just waiting to harvest the rewards ☺️ You know the ticker 🟪

Congrats to @virtuals_io and all projects in the Virtuals ecosystem. 2M agent jobs and $480M aGDP are great milestones. Proud to be part of this journey and contribute to the growth of aGDP. Together, we are building the largest agent commerce ecosystem.

If you are building with @virtuals_io ACP and already read the whitepaper, so when reading the ERC-8183 docs will feel very familiar. So the question is, is Virtuals ACP actually ERC-8183? If not, what makes them different? Discover here 👇

Thrilled to announce that @Capminal has just graduated from @virtuals_io ACP, thanks to @0x02yang for your support 🫡 Right now, we are proudly holding the top position on the AGDP epoch 2 leaderboard https://t.co/Fgt0fMuxIS

🤖 AI Agents need more than hype. They need real infra. This diagram breaks down the Infrastructure Stack of @virtuals_io, the leading project building the AI Agent ecosystem. In the Virtuals ecosystem, agents should not grow alone. We need one shared community, one aligned vision, and one mission to strengthen ACP together. If every project builds in isolation, no one knows who we are. But if we unite as the biggest AI agent ecosystem, we create massive network effects, shared liquidity, shared reputation, and real on-chain impact. Stronger together. Bigger together. This is how agents win in Web3. We are @Capminal, and we have been building here for 9 months. Open for any collab or integration 🫡

It's a big update 🫡 Virtuals all-in their revenue for agentic commerce. If you didn't know, @virtuals_io ACP is now an open system. Anyone who runs an OpenClaw agent can let their agent join the network and start interacting with other agents inside ACP. Your agent can provide services, use services, and collaborate with others in a seamless way. This is not just an idea on paper. It is a working agentic ecosystem where agents connect, exchange value, and support each other in real time. Builders can plug in, experiment, and scale without asking for permission. The agentic ecosystem is not the future. It is happening right now.

Trust infrastructure is crucial rn, and @0xmaiat is building it. We are excited to integrate with @0xmaiat to make swaps safer. Now, before you swap, you can quickly check a token in our Cap Terminal, or just tag @captain_dackie on X. Together we make DeFi on @virtuals_io agent commerce safer

“The man in the arena” Epoch 3 of @virtuals_io aGDP has come to an end, and it was a journey full of emotions, debates, and many side stories. I'm happy to finish in the #1 spot, but at the same time there is a bit of regret because I couldn't help our teammates reach a better ranking. Still, we worked well together as a team. I also have a lot of respect for our opponent @0xhyperbet and their team. Both teams did a great job and kept racing until the very last minutes. We are all players in the game, we understand the rules, and we are doing our best for our holders. I really like this spirit 💪 The aGDP mechanism may change, or it may stay the same. That depends on whether Virtuals sees the current system as good or not. For now, I am still waiting to see what changes may come next.

$VVV broke ATH today with the strength of model VVV/ sVVV/ $DIEM 👀 And now we have a fork of this model with $CAP / sCAP / $CAPU 🟪 To @captain_dackie, buy me 4500$ of $CAP using $VIRTUAL, I need to setup LP for CAPU now 🫡

Everywhere else feels like downtrend, but not on @base. Base is leading all chains in 7D net flow right now. Liquidity is flowing in, builders are shipping, and attention is growing fast. @virtuals_io, @bankrbot, @liquid_launcher, @clanker_world, @captain_dackie ... whatever launcher, tokenize your project on Base now then you can earn.

Just update, our @virtuals_io aGDP reward now $12,079 👀 https://t.co/a51Bz0JWMi

Virtuals is proving to be the top agent launchpad The launch of @virtuals_io Console is truly game changing. Now, even the most casual users can launch an agent with ease. $VIRTUAL feels seriously undervalued imo.

We’ve always stayed aligned with every program at @virtuals_io, from ACP and aGDP to DegenClaw and the launcher UI.... We’ve been building for long term growth 💪 Cap Orbs is a Virtuals Launcher UI

Market rekt but @captain_dackie green, bc he decided to short all markets, he found a way to manipulate markets following some kols said 😂 All history trades posted to forum. Subscribe him here: https://t.co/arCbBTESRa Road to $100k reward of Degenclaw @virtuals_io 💪 https://t.co/kUBLV4bt4a

An AI Agent project does not have to stay tied to the launcher infrastructure it uses. For example, the token of @pmfi_cc launched via @bankrbot but still uses ACP from @virtuals_io. Same with us: $CAP launched on Virttuals, but we still ship Cap Orbs that launches token on Virtuals, @clanker_world or @liquid_launcher. Our OpenCAP Gateway that integrates with OpenRouter, Virtuals Compute, @AskSurplus and @AskVenice No borders, just building together so we can win together.

Performance 24h of @virtuals_io ecosystem today 🔥 Board by @Capminal Gems Hope you guys like this new UI Type to DeFAI https://t.co/kt7ET97hRw

New day, new aGDP epoch, new drop 💰 @captain_dackie please help airdrop 100$ $CAP to Cap Guild 🫡 @virtuals_io aGDP Epoch 3 started. https://t.co/OUcAA03wU2

Another win for $CAP @Capminal in the second consecutive epoch on @virtuals_io aGDP. In this epoch 4, we secured positions #1 and #8 on the leaderboard. That means $13.5K worth of $CAP will be bought back, and this is our third week in a row with buyback volume rolling in. During Epoch 4, we helped generate $75K in revenue for Virtuals aGDP. We will keep building and continue contributing to the long term vision of the Virtuals's agentic ecosystem 💪 Never to late to be $CAP's holders and join CAP Guild 🔥 Btw, if you hate us, you hate.

Soon, I’ll release a public repo with the code to run fully automated agents on @virtuals_io Degen Arena, no humans in the loop. You’ll be free to customize and create unique strategies for your own agents, making the game truly yours.

Congrats to the 10 agents selected by the @virtuals_io AI Council this week. My agent made the shortlist in 2 out of 3 models, GPT-5.4 and Opus-4.6, but didn’t make the top 10. The main weakness is still win rate not high enough, even though the strategy already runs independently and is profitable. I’ve seen some tips like just depositing funds and holding losing positions so you don’t take losses, only closing winning trades to keep the win rate high and get better scores from the model. But I won’t follow that. My goal is not top 10, it’s building a system that can generate real pnl long term. In trading, discipline matters most, along with constant system tuning. I’m not chasing AI Council rankings while putting funds at risk by holding losses without a stop loss. Btw, season 3 is completely no stress. The agent trades fully automated without me, and I’ve had time to build new features for @Capminal.

🎉🎉 Congrats to $CAP holders and CAP Guild for still winning spot #1 of @virtuals_io aGDP this epoch (Epoch 5). A message for the Virtuals community: stay calm and think clearly when you see the FUD KOLs are spreading about aGDP. The teams leading aGDP are not taking money from anyone. They win rewards from the ACP fees they generate themselves (the top 11 projects created 80% of ACP fees), plus the trading tax rewarded by Virtuals. Why are some KOL groups nonstop FUDing the top aGDP projects? Because they cannot profit from them. It also exposes a simple truth: they get paid to praise, and if a project does not pay, they attack. We spoke up, and many projects spoke up too. KOLs are often the fastest channel to reach new users and builders. Sadly, in this downtrend, the loudest voices are the ones trying to farm attention and control the narrative. They think they can steer the market and force projects to obey, hand them tokens, and earn “good reviews”. They are wrong. We are still here, backing real builders. aGDP may be updated this epoch, but serious teams who do real research and investigate will still earn strong spots on the leaderboard.

Our agent detect $VIRTUAL @virtuals_io has short signal and open a short 😓 Subscribe now here: https://t.co/arCbBTESRa https://t.co/HYu5vVOo5K

🤖 The LLM Shift That Changed AI Agents Nine months ago, when we did the TGE for $CAP on @virtuals_io Genesis, AI and LLM tech was still very basic. The popular models back then were 4o and 4.1, and there was no real reasoning. At that time, if a project launched a clean AI terminal with a nice UI and a custom character config, it was already enough to launch a token and sell. If you wanted to parse human language with an LLM and get the correct request body, you had to write very long prompts and provide many examples. It was not simple. Today, AI models are evolving at crazy speed. Reasoning models like opus 4.6 and codex 5.3 can understand human chat messages naturally, without too much instruction. Building AI Agents is now much easier. LLM performance is more accurate, more stable, and far more efficient than before. The architecture of AI Agent systems has also changed. In the past, the Core LLM was hosted on the server, while the client only acted as an AI Agent or AI Terminal. Now, with the launch of OpenClaw, the LLM layer has moved to the client side. > @bankrbot , @Butler_Agent , @captain_dackie are agents that has core LLM at server side. Agent backends are mainly API systems communicating through API keys. Most major agents today support LLM on both server and client side. Soon, @Capminal will launch our own new AI Agent framework. You can already experience the intelligence of our new framework at https://t.co/rsn1BOCkXu or tag @captain_dackie to try it out. Stay tuned for our next updates.

Robinhood Chain integrate @virtuals_io 's AI agent infra from day one 👀

I can tweak the strategy so the agent takes fewer trades and avoids overtrading by raising the entry signals for higher certainty on each trade. But imo @virtuals_io Degen Claw also needs to stress test the system, so I set my agent will open trades on 2/3 signals 😂

If you’re a crypto investor, a builder, or anyone in this market, this is not the time to panic sell your bags. While most people are scared, I’m buying more at these prices. $VIRTUAL, $LIQ, $CAP... https://t.co/eKmPp7m8GC

Robotics is a new sector. In crypto, it’s not really new because many projects used the robotics narrative just to sell tokens, without real use cases. But things changed when the team at @virtuals_io and other robotics projects in the Virtuals ecosystem actually started building. Now it’s no longer just a story. These are becoming real projects at the front of robotics, AI agents, and blockchain. That’s why I’m bullish on $VIRTUAL.

Currently, I’ve just moved Captain Dackie on @virtuals_io Degen Claw from Claude Code /loop to OpenClaw. An interval report for the account status has also been set up. More detailed monitoring is ongoing, stay tuned and subscribe here → https://t.co/arCbBTESRa https://t.co/zdc8dOrjNb

Yo @captain_dackie , time to airdrop 🔥 Buy 200$ $CAP by $VIRTUAL then reward them to CAP XP leaderboard Thanks community for supporting us at epoch 2.

If you didn't know, models provided by @virtuals_io Compute on OpenCAP are nearly free at now, just need to stake a little bit of $CAPU then you can try. This sponsor come from Virtuals 's $400k inference credits program 🟩🟪 https://t.co/nyr2nfiRZa

Top @virtuals_io gainers today 🟩 @base szn = Virtuals szn 👀 Have you picked your fav yet? https://t.co/YGVd9dd8Sb

If you haven't realized the potential of $VIRTUAL, you're already late.

Here is the demo how @Capminal 's OpenCAP Gateway that integrated with @virtuals_io Compute as a provider. I will use it to submit the Virtuals showcase 🟩🟪 https://t.co/MR95PVMaGE

Now it’s time to build, builders, AI lovers, and $CAP holders. If you use AI models on OpenCAP, models provided by @virtuals_io Compute are sponsored inference credits from the Virtuals team. That’s 95% off.

Just update, our @virtuals_io aGDP reward $9,480 now 👀 https://t.co/9wkYLpwNu1

2 tp can cover for 4 sl, that’s the real edge of this strategy R/R 2:1 Subscribe our agent now on @virtuals_io Degen Claw → https://t.co/arCbBTESRa https://t.co/vHB0KL6r9a

$CAP @Capminal with V2 release reached top #1 gainers on @virtuals_io today, higher 🚀 https://t.co/o5KrZ1T7O4

The simpler the user experience, the faster liquidity flows in. Great move from @virtuals_io 🟩

congrats another titan landed on @virtuals_io 👀 you all know two previous titans listed @binance shout out to @xmaquina, $DEUS is the ticker 🔥

Numbers never lie, again. All the metrics we share can be verified onchain, and they have been improving month by month. Our decision to invest in @virtuals_io aGDP has proven to be the right call so far. Our $CAP holders have shown strong support, and the price momentum is moving in a positive direction. Ignore the drama. We keep building. The data speaks for itself, and only those who are truly invested will understand what is right and what is not.

Today is a good day to load more.... hey @captain_dackie , buy me 100$ $CAP using $VIRTUAL https://t.co/SGA0wY5TuY

Yo @captain_dackie , buy me 500$ $CAP using $VIRTUAL in 3 days, allowed gain 30%. Let’s try our TWAP feature on X. This is the easiest way to control your DCA orders.

Builders using OpenCAP Gateway: if you want to try AI models on @virtuals_io Compute for free, star our $CAPU repo now 🫡

The Agent Score formula of @virtuals_io aGDP just got a major upgrade. If you read my previous post, you already know the old formula only measured diversity at the agent level. It looked at how many different buyers an agent had. More buyers, better score. Simple. Now there is a second layer of diversity. Before, only the agent needed buyer diversity. Now, each buyer must also have diversity in how they use agents. In simple terms, a buyer cannot just call one single agent and still give you full score power. They need to interact with multiple agents across the ecosystem. This changes everything. If a project creates many OpenClaw agents acting as buyers just to call their own agent, those buyers will have very low Spend Diversity. Why? Because they only use one agent. Under the new formula, their contribution is heavily discounted. Volume alone is no longer enough. ------------------------------------------------ Assume total sales = $1,000. ------------------------------------------------ Case 1: 1 whale buyer spends $1,000 Buyer Diversity is near the minimum around 0.10 Agent Score is heavily low Case 2: 10 buyers spend $100 each Revenue is more evenly distributed Buyer Diversity increases significantly Case 3: 100 buyers spend $10 each Very balanced distribution Buyer Diversity is close to the maximum near 1.0 Even with the same $1,000 total sales, the agent with 100 balanced buyers will have a much higher score than the one depending on a single whale. ------------------------------------------------ Now combine that with Spend Diversity at the buyer level. ------------------------------------------------ If those 100 buyers only use one agent, each buyer gets the minimum Spend Diversity multiplier of 0.10. If they spread across 10 or more agents, their multiplier can jump above 0.60 or even 0.80. That means the same $1,000 volume can produce 6x to 8x higher Agent Score depending on user behavior. ------------------------------------------------ The system now rewards real users. Real buyers explore different agents, try different services, and spread their spend across the ecosystem. Those are the buyers that boost your Agent Score. This update shifts the game from volume farming to real utility. Instead of chasing fake volume or fake buyer counts, projects are now pushed to attract real crypto users who actively use multiple agents. In short, quality buyers > fake volume.

In traditional markets, gold and crypto feel a bit old school right now. Stocks are taking most of the world’s attention, and the money flowing into stocks is very strong. Now imagine @virtuals_io and its partners can pull even a small part of that stock trading money onchain. Agents could auto trade tokenized stocks directly on blockchain. Short term, your token might not pump right away. But long term, once the infrastructure runs smoothly, a sector rotation from stocks to crypto can happen very fast. Keep holding your tokens.

Remember, we are the first project from @virtuals_io launch a 'stake capital earn compute' model and launch a llm gateway 🫡 Next integration will be @Capminal x S______ 👀

Thanks to @virtuals_io, aGDP is a sweet month for $CAP holders 🫡. We proud to contribute rev to the most important metrics of Virtuals eco. To @captain_dackie, buy me 200$ CAP using $VIRTUAL then airdrop these to CAP Guild. Our community is a part of this success, always appreciate 🙏

The truth is, our users used to come only from Capminal. Now, they are agents from @virtuals_io ACP, Base, anywhere... The agentic market made this happen.

Right now, in aGDP reward structure, the token trading tax is even lower than ACP service fees 👀. We are in a broad low liquidity and low volume phase across the market, not just @virtuals_io but the entire crypto market. https://t.co/hkd6MQNnlR

CAP has shown impressive organic growth since joining @virtuals_io aGDP from epoch 2. Today, Epoch 3 has officially started, and we are ready to make this week count 🫡 You can front run it. I start first, hey @captain_dackie buy me 1000$ $CAP using $VIRTUAL, duration in 3 days, allowed gain 20%

gcap weekend, Help me swap buy more 200$ $CAP using $VIRTUAL @captain_dackie X changed algorithm and I need to do more acts on social 😂

I’m tuning trading strategy for agent, then monitoring the results, step by step. Hope agent can do better than human 😂 Road to $100k reward 💪 Degen Claw Arena by @virtuals_io

We need more neutral perspectives like this in the @virtuals_io ecosystem, the community is becoming too divided Thanks for great update 🫡

If you missed it, $DIEM was around $90 late last year and ran to $1900 at ATH, over 20x. Now we’re building $CAP / sCAP / $CAPU, forked from VVV / sVVV / $DIEM. We’re also the first team on @virtuals_io to build a model stake capital earn compute, and we’ve already shipped an inference gateway called OpenCAP. @ErikVoorhees built the alpha for @AskVenice. We’re building the beta 🟪

Currently our community meet 'Failed to get swap route' when click subscribe @captain_dackie , please help to fix @ethermage @miratisu_ps @virtuals_io 🙏 https://t.co/P8rmoUXvsk

Many people ask why $ROBO, the first Titan of @virtuals_io, was promoted as a big project but launched with only a $1.6M market cap after TGE. At the LP stage, they added $500K VIRTUAL + $500K ROBO, so liquidity looked solid. But trading volume was only around $1M, much lower than some smaller projects that launched before. That's because $ROBO is a cross chain project. They opened liquidity pools on multiple chains. On @base, it was paired with $VIRTUAL. Because liquidity was split across different chains, each chain only had around $1M to $1.5M LP. That made the on chain volume look smaller. On top of that, they listed on Binance Alpha, Binance Futures, and full spot on major CEX like Coinbase and Kraken. So most of the real trading volume happened on CEX, not on chain. In short, liquidity was divided across chains, and volume was concentrated on centralized exchanges.

Builders usually have to choose what to break: VC money → dilute the cap table Trading fees → disappear when volume dies Team token sales → hurt the chart @virtuals_io ACF offers a third path: automated capital formation tied to market traction, paid in USDC, separated from the main trading pair. I made a simple diagram to summarize how the mechanism works. Read it below.

While the AI industry is still theorizing about agentic AI use cases, @virtuals_io protocol already has real infrastructure running hundreds of live agents on ACP. While many people still think robotics is too early and that Virtuals should just focus on its strength in AI agents instead of spending money on robotics, they keep pushing forward with Eastworld and incubating promising robotics projects. And 18 months later, when robotics hits mass adoption, you will still see $VIRTUAL there, just with a much bigger mc.

If you’ve noticed, we’ve burned 41.23% of the $CAP token supply and are continuing to do so. We're the top token-burning agent on @virtuals_io Degen Arena, leading the pack and turning every burn into a win. Every month, we use our protocol fees to buy back and burn tokens. https://t.co/YJW4ST5K6z

Jump to this link https://t.co/cFelmXG6by to directly 'Hire' our agent 🫡 Together we build @virtuals_io agentic economy 🔥

I will build the best defai agent on @virtuals_io ecosystem 🟪🟩

Big thanks to @virtuals_io for constantly improving the system to make it fairer for everyone 💪 Each upgrade makes the game more transparent, more competitive, and more rewarding for real builders who create real value. This is how a strong agent economy is built step by step. Together, @Capminal will keep building and growing the agent ecosystem bigger and stronger every day.

I never thought we would have such a strong start with @virtuals_io ACP. The agent ecosystem from Virtuals is truly amazing. If you want to build an agent, just onboard ACP. Your agent will have users. It will get real traffic. You will see job logs running live on your system monitor. That is the moment every builder is waiting for.

With LP agent tokens paired with $VIRTUAL, the strategy is simple. If you believe $VIRTUAL can 10x when altcoin season arrives, just hold one strong agent. Choose an agent with no inflation and continuous building. As VIRTUAL grows, the agent moves with it. A 10x on VIRTUAL can turn into a natural 100x on a good agent. You just hold and let it play out.

The game has shifted on @virtuals_io with Degen Claw. Now, AI scores the results. This week, I’ll focus on improving the win rate rather than just the profit and loss (PnL), as the prompts seem to favor boosting win rates over earnings. Week 1 was all about setup and drafting, and now it’s time to fine-tune our strategy. Subscribers will receive a full refund, so please check your wallets. If you’re still curious to see how an agent can trade without human intervention, subscribe to Captain Dackie here: https://t.co/FbB3F6XtwQ

Amazing program from @virtuals_io. Virtuals has always been a team with strong infra that builders can rely on. Projects can get sponsored inference credits when they build on Virtuals through their inference gateway. Just wondering, we’re building OpenCAP as an inference gateway on our side too. Is it eligible 😅?

The @virtuals_io homepage has just been updated. Now, aGDP is featured as a main section on the homepage, right next to ACP 👀 Which project are you bullish on? Me first, @captain_dackie buy me 100$ $CAP 🫡 https://t.co/ut0cv6GtL2

Helpful recap about the live demo of @virtuals_io ACP with @buildonbase. ppl who have no time to watch the full livestream can read here👇

yo @captain_dackie airdrop 30$ $VIRTUAL to CAP Guild now 👀

. @virtuals_io please fix degenclaw since agents cannot open/modify trade and all request doesn't change stt to negotiation 🙏 https://t.co/pcBWVYmrj0

My May prediction: > Market bullish again > $ETH break ATH > $BASE airdrop > Alt season > $VIRTUAL break ATH > @virtuals_io season What I'm missing ? 👀 https://t.co/MWTrMlQR9f

Necessary steps to migrate old @virtuals_io Degen Claw agent to the new ACP V2 👇